TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Kiplinger report describes a Los Angeles accountant weighing when to claim Social Security as he plans to move to Mexico, where he expects a pension that exceeds his stated monthly budget. The case illustrates that delaying can increase monthly benefits, but the decision also depends on work, taxes, other income, health and what a person wants the money to do.
A Kiplinger report about a Los Angeles accountant weighing when to claim Social Security argues that choosing the earliest possible or largest monthly benefit is not, by itself, a complete retirement plan. The worker, identified as Carlos, expects a Mexican pension to begin in January 2027 and is considering returning to Mexico, making his decision dependent on his income, work plans and personal priorities.
Carlos had worked legally in the United States since 2009 and planned to keep working until about September 2027 before moving back to Mexico. He was considering several possible claiming dates, including when his pension begins, when work ends, after his move, at full retirement age or at age 70. The report says an adviser first checked whether Carlos qualified for benefits on his U.S. earnings record rather than assuming Mexican work would fill any gap.
The report says Carlos expected the Mexican pension to provide the equivalent of $2,500 a month, compared with a stated monthly budget of about $2,200 after his move. Those estimates do not include a full assessment of taxes, unexpected costs or whether that budget would remain sufficient over time. The pension could give him room to consider delaying Social Security, but it would not make the financial outcomes of different filing dates identical.
Delaying retirement benefits past full retirement age can earn delayed retirement credits until age 70, increasing the monthly payment, according to the report. Claiming while still working before full retirement age may also bring the retirement earnings test into play: some benefits can be withheld when earnings exceed applicable limits, with an adjustment later at full retirement age for affected months. The report says Carlos’s Mexican pension would not trigger the Windfall Elimination Provision for benefits payable from January 2024 onward, while overseas payment rules and tax residency still required attention.
How Personal Goals Shape Claiming
The case matters because a higher monthly benefit is only one part of a retirement decision. For someone with other income, the question may be whether to accept more money later or begin benefits earlier to support current needs and priorities. Carlos told the adviser that he wanted money sooner partly to help family and friends. That preference cannot be converted into a benefit formula, but it is relevant to what he considers a good outcome.
The report does not establish that early claiming is better for other retirees, or that Carlos has made a final choice. It presents his circumstances as an example of why comparisons should incorporate spending needs, other income, work and taxes, alongside the value of a larger future payment. A plan should also account for the possibility of living longer than expected, when reliable income later in life may become more important.
Social Security claiming decision guide
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Choices Behind Carlos’s Timeline
Carlos’s question was complicated by decisions that do not have to occur on the same date. He could consider returning to Mexico when his pension begins without automatically claiming U.S. Social Security then. The report says the U.S.-Mexico Social Security agreement had not entered into force, so his eligibility needed to be checked against his U.S. earnings record rather than assumed from his Mexican work history.
His remaining U.S. earnings also mattered if he claimed before full retirement age while continuing to work. Separately, the report notes that the Windfall Elimination Provision no longer applies to benefits payable for January 2024 and later, addressing one potential concern about his Mexican pension. That did not resolve all cross-border issues: the report says overseas benefit payments and tax residency still needed review.
The account is an adviser’s description of an individual case, not a report of a new Social Security rule or a recommendation from the Social Security Administration. Its central point is that a benefit statement can show estimated amounts, but it cannot decide what a person values most or account for every financial and family circumstance.
“The equivalent of $2,500 a month.”
— Carlos, as quoted in the Kiplinger report
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Report Does Not Resolve
The account does not say which claiming date Carlos ultimately chose, provide his exact Social Security benefit estimates or set out a full comparison of total income across different lifespans. His pension and budget figures are expectations described in the report, not confirmed future results. It also does not quantify how taxes, exchange rates, health costs, inflation or changes in spending could affect his plans after moving.
The report says an individualized analysis could compare filing dates and account for his remaining earnings, but it does not publish that analysis. More generally, no reader can infer from Carlos’s case that claiming early or delaying will produce the better result for them. The answer depends on personal circumstances and the assumptions used in any projection.
overseas pension tax planning tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Next Step Is a Full Comparison
For Carlos, the next step described in the report is to compare realistic claiming dates using his earnings, expected pension, spending needs and cross-border tax and payment considerations. The report gives no timetable for that analysis or update on his final decision. His pension was expected to begin in January 2027, while his planned work and move were expected to continue into September of that year.
For readers facing a similar choice, the report recommends identifying what the money is meant to support before comparing dates. A useful analysis would examine benefits at different ages, the effect of continued work, other sources of income and the possibility of a long retirement. The choice remains individual: the financial cost of receiving benefits earlier can be estimated, while the personal value of using that money at a particular time may be harder to measure.
retirement planning books for expats
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
No. It argues that neither claiming early nor waiting for the largest monthly amount is automatically the right choice. The decision depends on a person’s finances, plans and priorities.
Why was Carlos considering delaying his U.S. benefit?
He expected a Mexican pension of about $2,500 a month against a stated budget of about $2,200. That income could allow him to consider delaying Social Security, which can increase monthly benefits when a person waits past full retirement age, up to age 70.
According to the report, claiming before full retirement age while still working can bring the retirement earnings test into play. Benefits may be withheld when earnings exceed applicable limits, and the Social Security Administration later adjusts benefits at full retirement age for affected months.
Does Carlos’s case determine the best claiming age for other people?
No. His circumstances are specific to his U.S. work record, expected pension, planned move, budget and family priorities. Other people should compare claiming dates using their own income, work plans, taxes and needs.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
